Adam Tooze argues that there are three ways to reconcile “the feverish talk of deglobalisation and decoupling” with statistics that “show an inertial continuity in trade and investment patterns: business as usual, insofar as nothing has changed and the deglobalisation talk is empty; a new Cold War in which the US is trying seriously to reconfigure its own and the world economy to counter China; or a new form of globalization that mixes old and new aspects. The third option includes considerable confusion as registered by the term polycrisis.
Three Ways to Read the ‘Deglobalisation’ Debate
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2efe8/2efe85e33157a9b54391258999a54fce59f69745" alt="Polycrisis-Placeholder-PS1500 Polycrisis-Placeholder-PS1500"
Author(s)
Adam Tooze
Publication Date
30 January 2023
Publisher
Financial Times
DOI / URL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2efe8/2efe85e33157a9b54391258999a54fce59f69745" alt="Polycrisis-Placeholder-PS1500 Polycrisis-Placeholder-PS1500"
Resource Type
Op-Ed Commentary
Systems Addressed
Economy