David Henig and Daniel M. Knight argue that anthropology has much to offer in the conceptualization and study of polycrisis, drawing on a disciplinary “toolkit that includes historicity, temporality, scalarity and intersectionality, which adds much needed texture to the polycrisis theory” (p. 4). The authors consider the nature of crisis as an abrupt disruption versus persistent condition, challenge the “unprecedented” nature of today’s polycrisis, and highlight the tension between oversimplification and overcomplexification.
Polycrisis: Prompts for an Emerging Worldview
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d749/0d7496a6f67c5385b010c1132b3a48e695505410" alt="Resource placeholder 2024 PS1500 Resource placeholder 2024 PS1500"
Author(s)
David Henig and Daniel M. Knight
Publication Date
1 April 2023
Publisher
Anthropology Today (vol. 39, iss. 2)
DOI / URL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d749/0d7496a6f67c5385b010c1132b3a48e695505410" alt="Resource placeholder 2024 PS1500 Resource placeholder 2024 PS1500"
Resource Type
Academic Journal Article