The authors respond to criticism of the use of the word “polycrisis”, arguing that the world’s current crises are in many ways unprecedented and thus merit a new word and require new forms of analysis. They argue, “the past isn’t a good guide to our present and future. Too many basic parameters – such as the energy imbalance at Earth’s surface – have changed. At the same time, we’re seeing new, deep links among crises that include synchronizing dynamics. The simple extrapolation of past trends doesn’t work any more.”
Dismissing the Term ‘Polycrisis’ has One Inevitable Consequence – Reality Always Bites
Author(s)
Thomas Homer-Dixon, Michael Lawrence, and Scott Janzwood
Publication Date
18 February 2023
Publisher
The Globe and Mail
DOI / URL
Resource Type
Op-Ed Commentary